Compare how Mitch Fifield and Sue Boyce voted on a character test for Australian visas

Now this is where it gets a bit tricky… Two people might vote the same way on votes they both attended, so their votes are 100% in agreement. They might also have voted in a way we’d describe differently when looking at all of one person's votes. If the other person didn’t or couldn’t have attended those votes we leave those out of the comparison. Because that just wouldn’t be fair now, would it?

Most important divisions relevant to this policy

These are the most important divisions related to the policy “for a character test for Australian visas” which either Mitch Fifield or Sue Boyce could have attended. They are weighted much more strongly than other divisions when calculating the position of Mitch Fifield and Sue Boyce on this policy. Where a person could not have attended a division because they were not a member of parliament at the time (or in the wrong house) it is marked as "-".

Division	Mitch Fifield	Sue Boyce	Supporters vote
4th Jul 2011 – Senate Migration Amendment (Strengthening the Character Test and Other Provisions) Bill 2011 - In Committee - Apply to people outside detention	Yes	Yes	Yes
4th Jul 2011 – Senate Migration Amendment (Strengthening the Character Test and Other Provisions) Bill 2011 - Third Reading - Read a third time	absent	absent	Yes

Other divisions relevant to this policy

These are less important divisions which are related to the policy “for a character test for Australian visas” which either Mitch Fifield or Sue Boyce could have attended. Where a person could not have attended a division because they were not a member of parliament at the time (or in the wrong house) it is marked as "-".

Division	Mitch Fifield	Sue Boyce	Supporters vote
no votes listed