Compare how Mitch Fifield and Bill Heffernan voted on a Royal Commission into banking

Now this is where it gets a bit tricky… Two people might vote the same way on votes they both attended, so their votes are 100% in agreement. They might also have voted in a way we’d describe differently when looking at all of one person's votes. If the other person didn’t or couldn’t have attended those votes we leave those out of the comparison. Because that just wouldn’t be fair now, would it?

Most important divisions relevant to this policy

These are the most important divisions related to the policy “for a Royal Commission into banking” which either Mitch Fifield or Bill Heffernan could have attended. They are weighted much more strongly than other divisions when calculating the position of Mitch Fifield and Bill Heffernan on this policy. Where a person could not have attended a division because they were not a member of parliament at the time (or in the wrong house) it is marked as "-".

Division	Mitch Fifield	Bill Heffernan	Supporters vote
no votes listed

Other divisions relevant to this policy

These are less important divisions which are related to the policy “for a Royal Commission into banking” which either Mitch Fifield or Bill Heffernan could have attended. Where a person could not have attended a division because they were not a member of parliament at the time (or in the wrong house) it is marked as "-".

Division	Mitch Fifield	Bill Heffernan	Supporters vote
28th Jun 2018, 12:25 PM – Senate Motions - Royal Commission into Misconduct in the Banking, Superannuation and Financial Services Industry - Funding and farmers	absent	-	Yes
19th Apr 2016, 7:47 PM – Senate Motions - Financial Services - Royal Commission into banking sector	No	No	Yes
19th Apr 2016, 6:41 PM – Senate Motions - Financial Services - Establish a Royal Commission	No	No	Yes
24th Jun 2015 – Senate Committees — Financial Services	No	absent	Yes