We can't say anything concrete about how Kay Patterson voted on voluntary student union fees
How Kay Patterson voted compared to someone who agrees that university students should be able to choose whether or not to pay student services and amenities fees (also called student union fees)
Most important divisions relevant to this policy
These are the most important divisions related to the policy “for voluntary student union fees” which Kay Patterson could have attended. They are weighted much more strongly than other divisions when calculating the position of Kay Patterson on this policy.
| Division | Kay Patterson | Supporters vote | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| no votes listed | ||||||
Other divisions relevant to this policy
These are less important divisions which are related to the policy “for voluntary student union fees” which Kay Patterson could have attended.
| Division | Kay Patterson | Supporters vote |
|---|---|---|
11th Sep 2006, 3:50 PM – Senate Motions - End Voluntary Student Unionism |
No | No |
How "We can't say anything concrete about how they voted on" is worked out
Kay Patterson has only voted once on this policy and it wasn't on a "strong" vote. So it's not possible to draw a clear conclusion about their position.
This could be because there were simply not many relevant divisions (formal votes) during the time they've been in parliament (most votes happen on "the voices", so we simply have no decent record) or they were absent for votes that could have contributed to their voting record.