We can't say anything concrete about how John Madigan voted on refugee family reunification
How John Madigan voted compared to someone who agrees that the federal government should ensure that refugees in Australia are able to apply for family reunification visas so that their families can join them in Australia
Most important divisions relevant to this policy
These are the most important divisions related to the policy “for refugee family reunification” which John Madigan could have attended. They are weighted much more strongly than other divisions when calculating the position of John Madigan on this policy.
Division | John Madigan | Supporters vote |
---|---|---|
19th Mar 2015, 1:58 PM – Senate Migration Amendment (Protection and Other Measures) Bill 2014 - in Committee - Family protection visas |
absent | No |
17th Jul 2014, 2:21 PM – Senate Regulations and Determinations - Migration Amendment (2014 Measures No. 1) Regulation 2014 - Disallow |
absent | Yes |
Other divisions relevant to this policy
These are less important divisions which are related to the policy “for refugee family reunification” which John Madigan could have attended.
Division | John Madigan | Supporters vote |
---|---|---|
19th Mar 2015 – Senate Migration Amendment (Protection and Other Measures) Bill 2014 - Second Reading - Agree with bill's main idea |
No | No |
How "We can't say anything concrete about how they voted on" is worked out
John Madigan has only voted once on this policy and it wasn't on a "strong" vote. So it's not possible to draw a clear conclusion about their position.
This could be because there were simply not many relevant divisions (formal votes) during the time they've been in parliament (most votes happen on "the voices", so we simply have no decent record) or they were absent for votes that could have contributed to their voting record.