We can't say anything concrete about how Jane Hume voted on fee-free university and TAFE education
How Jane Hume voted compared to someone who agrees that the federal government should make tertiary and vocational education fee-free for all Australians
Most important divisions relevant to this policy
These are the most important divisions related to the policy “for fee-free university and TAFE education” which Jane Hume could have attended. They are weighted much more strongly than other divisions when calculating the position of Jane Hume on this policy.
| Division | Jane Hume | Supporters vote | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| no votes listed | ||||||
Other divisions relevant to this policy
These are less important divisions which are related to the policy “for fee-free university and TAFE education” which Jane Hume could have attended.
| Division | Jane Hume | Supporters vote |
|---|---|---|
25th Nov 2024, 1:16 PM – Senate Universities Accord (Student Support and Other Measures) Bill 2024 - Second Reading - Make university and TAFE free |
absent | Yes |
19th Oct 2023, 1:34 PM – Senate Higher Education Support Amendment (Response to the Australian Universities Accord Interim Report) Bill 2023 - Second Reading - Make university and TAFE fee-free |
No | Yes |
9th Aug 2023, 11:33 AM – Senate Trade Support Loans Amendment Bill 2023 and Student Loans (Overseas Debtors Repayment Levy) Amendment Bill 2023 - Second Reading - More support and no students fees for sector |
absent | Yes |
7th Aug 2023, 12:44 PM – Senate Jobs and Skills Australia Amendment Bill 2023 - Second Reading - TAFE funding and work conditions |
absent | Yes |
19th Jun 2023, 6:05 PM – Senate Education Legislation Amendment (Startup Year and Other Measures) Bill 2023 - Second Reading - Tertiary education & student debt |
absent | Yes |
How "We can't say anything concrete about how they voted on" is worked out
Jane Hume has only voted once on this policy and it wasn't on a "strong" vote. So it's not possible to draw a clear conclusion about their position.
This could be because there were simply not many relevant divisions (formal votes) during the time they've been in parliament (most votes happen on "the voices", so we simply have no decent record) or they were absent for votes that could have contributed to their voting record.