We can't say anything concrete about how Jane Hume voted on reducing economic inequality
How Jane Hume voted compared to someone who agrees that the federal government should intervene to ensure Australia's wealth is distributed more evenly
Most important divisions relevant to this policy
These are the most important divisions related to the policy “for reducing economic inequality” which Jane Hume could have attended. They are weighted much more strongly than other divisions when calculating the position of Jane Hume on this policy.
| Division | Jane Hume | Supporters vote | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| no votes listed | ||||||
Other divisions relevant to this policy
These are less important divisions which are related to the policy “for reducing economic inequality” which Jane Hume could have attended.
| Division | Jane Hume | Supporters vote |
|---|---|---|
26th Oct 2022, 10:46 AM – Senate Supply Bill (No. 3) 2022-2023, Supply Bill (No. 4) 2022-2023 and another - Second Reading - Repeal stage 3 tax cuts |
absent | Yes |
How "We can't say anything concrete about how they voted on" is worked out
Normally a person's votes count towards a score which is used to work out a simple phrase to summarise their position on a policy. However in this case Jane Hume was absent during all divisions for this policy. So, it's impossible to say anything concrete.