Compare how Jane Hume and Matthew Canavan voted on Australia's timber industry
Jane Hume
Liberal Party Senator for Victoria since July 2016
Matthew Canavan
Liberal National Party Senator for Queensland since July 2014
How they voted compared with each other and someone who agrees that the federal government should protect Australia's logging industry and the jobs it represents
Now this is where it gets a bit tricky… Two people might vote the same way on votes they both attended, so their votes are 100% in agreement. They might also have voted in a way we’d describe differently when looking at all of one person's votes. If the other person didn’t or couldn’t have attended those votes we leave those out of the comparison. Because that just wouldn’t be fair now, would it?
Most important divisions relevant to this policy
These are the most important divisions related to the policy “for Australia's timber industry” which either Jane Hume or Matthew Canavan could have attended. They are weighted much more strongly than other divisions when calculating the position of Jane Hume and Matthew Canavan on this policy. Where a person could not have attended a division because they were not a member of parliament at the time (or in the wrong house) it is marked as "-".
| Division | Jane Hume | Matthew Canavan | Supporters vote | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| no votes listed | ||||||
Other divisions relevant to this policy
These are less important divisions which are related to the policy “for Australia's timber industry” which either Jane Hume or Matthew Canavan could have attended. Where a person could not have attended a division because they were not a member of parliament at the time (or in the wrong house) it is marked as "-".