We can't say anything concrete about how Jana Stewart voted on net zero emissions by 2050
How Jana Stewart voted compared to someone who agrees that the federal government should commit to achieving net zero emissions by 2050 as part of Australia's efforts to address climate change
Most important divisions relevant to this policy
These are the most important divisions related to the policy “for net zero emissions by 2050” which Jana Stewart could have attended. They are weighted much more strongly than other divisions when calculating the position of Jana Stewart on this policy.
| Division | Jana Stewart | Supporters vote |
|---|---|---|
30th Mar 2023, 1:28 PM – Senate Safeguard Mechanism (Crediting) Amendment Bill 2023 - Third Reading - Pass the bill |
absent | Yes |
29th Mar 2023, 10:58 AM – Senate Safeguard Mechanism (Crediting) Amendment Bill 2023 - Second Reading - Agree with bill's main idea (with comment) |
absent | Yes |
8th Sep 2022, 2:07 PM – Senate Climate Change Bill 2022, Climate Change (Consequential Amendments) Bill 2022 - Third Reading - Pass the bills |
absent | Yes |
8th Sep 2022, 10:16 AM – Senate Climate Change Bill 2022, Climate Change (Consequential Amendments) Bill 2022 - Second Reading - Agree with bills' main idea |
absent | Yes |
Other divisions relevant to this policy
These are less important divisions which are related to the policy “for net zero emissions by 2050” which Jana Stewart could have attended.
| Division | Jana Stewart | Supporters vote | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| no votes listed | ||||||
How "We can't say anything concrete about how they voted on" is worked out
Normally a person's votes count towards a score which is used to work out a simple phrase to summarise their position on a policy. However in this case Jana Stewart was absent during all divisions for this policy. So, it's impossible to say anything concrete.