We can't say anything concrete about how James Paterson voted on requiring Parliamentary approval of military deployments
How James Paterson voted compared to someone who agrees that Australia should not deploy armed forces without the consideration and approval of Parliament
Most important divisions relevant to this policy
These are the most important divisions related to the policy “for requiring Parliamentary approval of military deployments” which James Paterson could have attended. They are weighted much more strongly than other divisions when calculating the position of James Paterson on this policy.
| Division | James Paterson | Supporters vote |
|---|---|---|
29th Mar 2023, 10:40 AM – Senate Defence Amendment (Parliamentary Approval of Overseas Service) Bill 2020 - Second Reading - Agree with bill's main idea |
absent | Yes |
Other divisions relevant to this policy
These are less important divisions which are related to the policy “for requiring Parliamentary approval of military deployments” which James Paterson could have attended.
| Division | James Paterson | Supporters vote | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| no votes listed | ||||||
How "We can't say anything concrete about how they voted on" is worked out
Normally a person's votes count towards a score which is used to work out a simple phrase to summarise their position on a policy. However in this case James Paterson was absent during all divisions for this policy. So, it's impossible to say anything concrete.