We can't say anything concrete about how James Paterson voted on banning the sale of non-therapeutic vapes
How James Paterson voted compared to someone who agrees that the federal government should restrict the importation, domestic manufacture, supply, commercial possession and advertisement of non-therapeutic and disposable vaping goods
Most important divisions relevant to this policy
These are the most important divisions related to the policy “for banning the sale of non-therapeutic vapes” which James Paterson could have attended. They are weighted much more strongly than other divisions when calculating the position of James Paterson on this policy.
| Division | James Paterson | Supporters vote | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| no votes listed | ||||||
Other divisions relevant to this policy
These are less important divisions which are related to the policy “for banning the sale of non-therapeutic vapes” which James Paterson could have attended.
| Division | James Paterson | Supporters vote |
|---|---|---|
26th Jun 2024, 12:09 PM – Senate Therapeutic Goods and Other Legislation Amendment (Vaping Reforms) Bill 2024 - in Committee - Government amendments |
absent | Yes |
How "We can't say anything concrete about how they voted on" is worked out
Normally a person's votes count towards a score which is used to work out a simple phrase to summarise their position on a policy. However in this case James Paterson was absent during all divisions for this policy. So, it's impossible to say anything concrete.