We can't say anything concrete about how James Paterson voted on increasing welfare payments
How James Paterson voted compared to someone who agrees that the federal government should increase the payments given to people receiving support from the government
Most important divisions relevant to this policy
These are the most important divisions related to the policy “for increasing welfare payments” which James Paterson could have attended. They are weighted much more strongly than other divisions when calculating the position of James Paterson on this policy.
| Division | James Paterson | Supporters vote |
|---|---|---|
2nd Aug 2023, 11:51 AM – Senate Social Services and Other Legislation Amendment (Strengthening the Safety Net) Bill 2023 - in Committee - Increase working-age payments |
absent | Yes |
Other divisions relevant to this policy
These are less important divisions which are related to the policy “for increasing welfare payments” which James Paterson could have attended.
| Division | James Paterson | Supporters vote | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| no votes listed | ||||||
How "We can't say anything concrete about how they voted on" is worked out
Normally a person's votes count towards a score which is used to work out a simple phrase to summarise their position on a policy. However in this case James Paterson was absent during all divisions for this policy. So, it's impossible to say anything concrete.