We can't say anything concrete about how James Paterson voted on reducing economic inequality
How James Paterson voted compared to someone who agrees that the federal government should intervene to ensure Australia's wealth is distributed more evenly
Most important divisions relevant to this policy
These are the most important divisions related to the policy “for reducing economic inequality” which James Paterson could have attended. They are weighted much more strongly than other divisions when calculating the position of James Paterson on this policy.
| Division | James Paterson | Supporters vote | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| no votes listed | ||||||
Other divisions relevant to this policy
These are less important divisions which are related to the policy “for reducing economic inequality” which James Paterson could have attended.
| Division | James Paterson | Supporters vote |
|---|---|---|
26th Oct 2022, 10:46 AM – Senate Supply Bill (No. 3) 2022-2023, Supply Bill (No. 4) 2022-2023 and another - Second Reading - Repeal stage 3 tax cuts |
absent | Yes |
How "We can't say anything concrete about how they voted on" is worked out
Normally a person's votes count towards a score which is used to work out a simple phrase to summarise their position on a policy. However in this case James Paterson was absent during all divisions for this policy. So, it's impossible to say anything concrete.