We can't say anything concrete about how James Paterson voted on net zero emissions by 2035
How James Paterson voted compared to someone who agrees that the federal government should commit to achieving net zero emissions by 2035 as part of Australia's efforts to address climate change
Most important divisions relevant to this policy
These are the most important divisions related to the policy “for net zero emissions by 2035” which James Paterson could have attended. They are weighted much more strongly than other divisions when calculating the position of James Paterson on this policy.
| Division | James Paterson | Supporters vote |
|---|---|---|
8th Sep 2022, 12:03 PM – Senate Climate Change Bill 2022, Climate Change (Consequential Amendments) Bill 2022 - in Committee - 2030 and 2035 targets |
absent | Yes |
Other divisions relevant to this policy
These are less important divisions which are related to the policy “for net zero emissions by 2035” which James Paterson could have attended.
| Division | James Paterson | Supporters vote |
|---|---|---|
13th May 2021, 2:16 PM – Senate Northern Australia Infrastructure Facility Amendment (Extension and Other Measures) Bill 2021 - in Committee - Net Zero by 2035 |
No | Yes |
How "We can't say anything concrete about how they voted on" is worked out
James Paterson has only voted once on this policy and it wasn't on a "strong" vote. So it's not possible to draw a clear conclusion about their position.
This could be because there were simply not many relevant divisions (formal votes) during the time they've been in parliament (most votes happen on "the voices", so we simply have no decent record) or they were absent for votes that could have contributed to their voting record.