We can't say anything concrete about how James Paterson voted on legalising medicinal and recreational marijuana
How James Paterson voted compared to someone who agrees that the government should make it legal for citizens to use marijuana (cannabis) for health and recreational purposes
Most important divisions relevant to this policy
These are the most important divisions related to the policy “for legalising medicinal and recreational marijuana” which James Paterson could have attended. They are weighted much more strongly than other divisions when calculating the position of James Paterson on this policy.
| Division | James Paterson | Supporters vote | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| no votes listed | ||||||
Other divisions relevant to this policy
These are less important divisions which are related to the policy “for legalising medicinal and recreational marijuana” which James Paterson could have attended.
| Division | James Paterson | Supporters vote |
|---|---|---|
24th Nov 2022, 11:06 AM – Senate Narcotic Drugs (Licence Charges) Amendment Bill 2022 - Second Reading - Amnesty from criminal prosecution |
absent | Yes |
How "We can't say anything concrete about how they voted on" is worked out
Normally a person's votes count towards a score which is used to work out a simple phrase to summarise their position on a policy. However in this case James Paterson was absent during all divisions for this policy. So, it's impossible to say anything concrete.