We can't say anything concrete about how Gavin Marshall voted on political intervention in research funding grants
How Gavin Marshall voted compared to someone who agrees that the federal government should be able to intervene in the research grant process with the Australian Research Council (ARC) by, for example, vetoing certain grant application where considered appropriate
Most important divisions relevant to this policy
These are the most important divisions related to the policy “for political intervention in research funding grants” which Gavin Marshall could have attended. They are weighted much more strongly than other divisions when calculating the position of Gavin Marshall on this policy.
| Division | Gavin Marshall | Supporters vote | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| no votes listed | ||||||
Other divisions relevant to this policy
These are less important divisions which are related to the policy “for political intervention in research funding grants” which Gavin Marshall could have attended.
| Division | Gavin Marshall | Supporters vote |
|---|---|---|
4th Dec 2018, 4:37 PM – Senate Motions - Australian Research Council - Remove National Interest Test |
absent | No |
13th Nov 2018, 3:52 PM – Senate Documents - Australian Research Council - Order for the Production of Documents |
absent | No |
How "We can't say anything concrete about how they voted on" is worked out
Normally a person's votes count towards a score which is used to work out a simple phrase to summarise their position on a policy. However in this case Gavin Marshall was absent during all divisions for this policy. So, it's impossible to say anything concrete.