We can't say anything concrete about how Derryn Hinch voted on tighter means testing of family payments
How Derryn Hinch voted compared to someone who agrees that the federal government should target family payments to low and moderate income households, to the exclusion of higher income households.
Most important divisions relevant to this policy
These are the most important divisions related to the policy “for tighter means testing of family payments ” which Derryn Hinch could have attended. They are weighted much more strongly than other divisions when calculating the position of Derryn Hinch on this policy.
| Division | Derryn Hinch | Supporters vote | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| no votes listed | ||||||
Other divisions relevant to this policy
These are less important divisions which are related to the policy “for tighter means testing of family payments ” which Derryn Hinch could have attended.
| Division | Derryn Hinch | Supporters vote |
|---|---|---|
22nd Mar 2017, 12:04 AM – Senate Social Services Legislation Amendment Bill 2017 - Third Reading - Pass the bill |
Yes | Yes |
How "We can't say anything concrete about how they voted on" is worked out
Derryn Hinch has only voted once on this policy and it wasn't on a "strong" vote. So it's not possible to draw a clear conclusion about their position.
This could be because there were simply not many relevant divisions (formal votes) during the time they've been in parliament (most votes happen on "the voices", so we simply have no decent record) or they were absent for votes that could have contributed to their voting record.