We can't say anything concrete about how David Van voted on supporting Israel
How David Van voted compared to someone who agrees that the Australian Government should support Israel internationally and use its voting power in bodies such as the United Nations to demonstrate this support
Most important divisions relevant to this policy
These are the most important divisions related to the policy “for supporting Israel” which David Van could have attended. They are weighted much more strongly than other divisions when calculating the position of David Van on this policy.
| Division | David Van | Supporters vote | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| no votes listed | ||||||
Other divisions relevant to this policy
These are less important divisions which are related to the policy “for supporting Israel” which David Van could have attended.
| Division | David Van | Supporters vote |
|---|---|---|
9th Oct 2024, 4:12 PM – Senate Motions - Israel Attacks: First Anniversary - Australia's social cohesion |
Yes | Yes |
25th Jun 2024, 4:57 PM – Senate Matters of Urgency - Middle East: Occupied Palestinian Territories - Preconditions to peace |
absent | Yes |
28th Feb 2024, 5:18 PM – Senate Matters of Urgency - Israel - Export of military equipment to Israel |
absent | No |
6th Feb 2024, 5:53 PM – Senate Matters of Urgency - Middle East - ICJ case against Israel |
absent | No |
18th Oct 2023, 5:15 PM – Senate Matters of Urgency - Israel - Oppose invasion of Gaza |
absent | No |
18th Oct 2023, 9:11 AM – Senate Motions - Israel - Support |
absent | Yes |
18th Oct 2023, 9:06 AM – Senate Motions - Israel - Condemn war crimes |
absent | No |
How "We can't say anything concrete about how they voted on" is worked out
David Van has only voted once on this policy and it wasn't on a "strong" vote. So it's not possible to draw a clear conclusion about their position.
This could be because there were simply not many relevant divisions (formal votes) during the time they've been in parliament (most votes happen on "the voices", so we simply have no decent record) or they were absent for votes that could have contributed to their voting record.