We can't say anything concrete about how Bridget McKenzie voted on climate change mitigation strategies (e.g., carbon capture and storage)
How Bridget McKenzie voted compared to someone who agrees that the federal government should encourage climate mitigation strategies, including carbon capture and storage (CCS) and marine geoengineering
Most important divisions relevant to this policy
These are the most important divisions related to the policy “for climate change mitigation strategies (e.g., carbon capture and storage)” which Bridget McKenzie could have attended. They are weighted much more strongly than other divisions when calculating the position of Bridget McKenzie on this policy.
| Division | Bridget McKenzie | Supporters vote |
|---|---|---|
13th Nov 2023, 6:32 PM – Senate Environment Protection (Sea Dumping) Amendment (Using New Technologies to Fight Climate Change) Bill 2023 - Third Reading - Pass the bill |
absent | Yes |
7th Nov 2023, 12:07 PM – Senate Environment Protection (Sea Dumping) Amendment (Using New Technologies to Fight Climate Change) Bill 2023 - Second Reading - Agree with the bill's main idea |
absent | Yes |
Other divisions relevant to this policy
These are less important divisions which are related to the policy “for climate change mitigation strategies (e.g., carbon capture and storage)” which Bridget McKenzie could have attended.
| Division | Bridget McKenzie | Supporters vote |
|---|---|---|
13th Nov 2023, 6:16 PM – Senate Environment Protection (Sea Dumping) Amendment (Using New Technologies to Fight Climate Change) Bill 2023 - in Committee - Keep bill as is |
absent | Yes |
How "We can't say anything concrete about how they voted on" is worked out
Normally a person's votes count towards a score which is used to work out a simple phrase to summarise their position on a policy. However in this case Bridget McKenzie was absent during all divisions for this policy. So, it's impossible to say anything concrete.