We can't say anything concrete about how Bridget McKenzie voted on smaller government
How Bridget McKenzie voted compared to someone who agrees that the federal government should reduce the size of the public service by, for example, abolishing unnecessary Commonwealth bodies and making sure there is no overlap in the functions of existing bodies
Most important divisions relevant to this policy
These are the most important divisions related to the policy “for smaller government” which Bridget McKenzie could have attended. They are weighted much more strongly than other divisions when calculating the position of Bridget McKenzie on this policy.
| Division | Bridget McKenzie | Supporters vote |
|---|---|---|
5th Feb 2018, 7:49 PM – Senate Statute Update (Smaller Government) Bill 2017 - Third Reading - Pass the bill |
absent | Yes |
Other divisions relevant to this policy
These are less important divisions which are related to the policy “for smaller government” which Bridget McKenzie could have attended.
| Division | Bridget McKenzie | Supporters vote | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| no votes listed | ||||||
How "We can't say anything concrete about how they voted on" is worked out
Normally a person's votes count towards a score which is used to work out a simple phrase to summarise their position on a policy. However in this case Bridget McKenzie was absent during all divisions for this policy. So, it's impossible to say anything concrete.