Compare how Bridget McKenzie and Alan Eggleston voted on Australia's timber industry
Bridget McKenzie
National Party Senator for Victoria since July 2011
Alan Eggleston
Former Liberal Party Senator for WA July 1996 – June 2014
How they voted compared with each other and someone who agrees that the federal government should protect Australia's logging industry and the jobs it represents
Now this is where it gets a bit tricky… Two people might vote the same way on votes they both attended, so their votes are 100% in agreement. They might also have voted in a way we’d describe differently when looking at all of one person's votes. If the other person didn’t or couldn’t have attended those votes we leave those out of the comparison. Because that just wouldn’t be fair now, would it?
Most important divisions relevant to this policy
These are the most important divisions related to the policy “for Australia's timber industry” which either Bridget McKenzie or Alan Eggleston could have attended. They are weighted much more strongly than other divisions when calculating the position of Bridget McKenzie and Alan Eggleston on this policy. Where a person could not have attended a division because they were not a member of parliament at the time (or in the wrong house) it is marked as "-".
Division | Bridget McKenzie | Alan Eggleston | Supporters vote | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
no votes listed |
Other divisions relevant to this policy
These are less important divisions which are related to the policy “for Australia's timber industry” which either Bridget McKenzie or Alan Eggleston could have attended. Where a person could not have attended a division because they were not a member of parliament at the time (or in the wrong house) it is marked as "-".