Compare how Bridget McKenzie and Jo Lindgren voted on letting environmental groups challenge the legality of certain government decisions

Now this is where it gets a bit tricky… Two people might vote the same way on votes they both attended, so their votes are 100% in agreement. They might also have voted in a way we’d describe differently when looking at all of one person's votes. If the other person didn’t or couldn’t have attended those votes we leave those out of the comparison. Because that just wouldn’t be fair now, would it?

Most important divisions relevant to this policy

These are the most important divisions related to the policy “for letting environmental groups challenge the legality of certain government decisions” which either Bridget McKenzie or Jo Lindgren could have attended. They are weighted much more strongly than other divisions when calculating the position of Bridget McKenzie and Jo Lindgren on this policy. Where a person could not have attended a division because they were not a member of parliament at the time (or in the wrong house) it is marked as "-".

Division Bridget McKenzie Jo Lindgren Supporters vote
no votes listed

Other divisions relevant to this policy

These are less important divisions which are related to the policy “for letting environmental groups challenge the legality of certain government decisions” which either Bridget McKenzie or Jo Lindgren could have attended. Where a person could not have attended a division because they were not a member of parliament at the time (or in the wrong house) it is marked as "-".

Division Bridget McKenzie Jo Lindgren Supporters vote

11th Nov 2015 – Senate Motions - Legal System - Stop environmental groups from challenging government decisions

Yes Yes No

20th Aug 2015, 12:18 PM – Senate Motions - Galilee Basin - Stop legal actions by anti-coal activists

Yes Yes No