Compare how Bridget McKenzie and Nigel Scullion voted on increasing parliamentary entitlements for current MPs and Senators
Bridget McKenzie
National Party Senator for Victoria since July 2011
Nigel Scullion
Former Country Liberal Party Senator for NT November 2001 – July 2019
How they voted compared with each other and someone who agrees that the federal governmnet should increase parliamentary entitlements for current MPs and Senators, such as legitimate expenditure, salary packages, superannuation entitlements and/or other allowances like the printing allowance
Now this is where it gets a bit tricky… Two people might vote the same way on votes they both attended, so their votes are 100% in agreement. They might also have voted in a way we’d describe differently when looking at all of one person's votes. If the other person didn’t or couldn’t have attended those votes we leave those out of the comparison. Because that just wouldn’t be fair now, would it?
Most important divisions relevant to this policy
These are the most important divisions related to the policy “for increasing parliamentary entitlements for current MPs and Senators” which either Bridget McKenzie or Nigel Scullion could have attended. They are weighted much more strongly than other divisions when calculating the position of Bridget McKenzie and Nigel Scullion on this policy. Where a person could not have attended a division because they were not a member of parliament at the time (or in the wrong house) it is marked as "-".
| Division | Bridget McKenzie | Nigel Scullion | Supporters vote | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| no votes listed | ||||||
Other divisions relevant to this policy
These are less important divisions which are related to the policy “for increasing parliamentary entitlements for current MPs and Senators” which either Bridget McKenzie or Nigel Scullion could have attended. Where a person could not have attended a division because they were not a member of parliament at the time (or in the wrong house) it is marked as "-".
| Division | Bridget McKenzie | Nigel Scullion | Supporters vote |
|---|---|---|---|
3rd Apr 2019, 9:34 PM – Senate Regulations and Determinations - Parliamentary Business Resources Amendment (2019 Measures No. 1) Regulations 2019 - Disallowance |
No | No | No |
21st Mar 2017, 4:08 PM – Senate Motions - Parliamentarians' Entitlements - Do not increase remuneration until in surplus |
No | No | No |
14th May 2009, 10:34 AM – Senate Motions - Remuneration Tribunal Determination - Electorate allowance |
- | No | No |
7th Sep 2006, 12:27 PM – Senate Motions - Motion for Disallowance - Parliamentary printing allowances |
- | No | No |
5th Sep 2006, 6:25 PM – Senate Motions - Remuneration and Allowances - Pay rise |
- | No | No |