We can't say anything concrete about how Stephen Parry voted on increasing funding for public schools
How Stephen Parry voted compared to someone who agrees that the federal government should increase funding for public schools and prioritise their funding over non-government (private) schools
Most important divisions relevant to this policy
These are the most important divisions related to the policy “for increasing funding for public schools” which Stephen Parry could have attended. They are weighted much more strongly than other divisions when calculating the position of Stephen Parry on this policy.
| Division | Stephen Parry | Supporters vote | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| no votes listed | ||||||
Other divisions relevant to this policy
These are less important divisions which are related to the policy “for increasing funding for public schools” which Stephen Parry could have attended.
| Division | Stephen Parry | Supporters vote |
|---|---|---|
13th Feb 2017, 4:24 PM – Senate Motions - Schools - Needs-based funding model |
absent | Yes |
How "We can't say anything concrete about how they voted on" is worked out
Normally a person's votes count towards a score which is used to work out a simple phrase to summarise their position on a policy. However in this case Stephen Parry was absent during all divisions for this policy. So, it's impossible to say anything concrete.