We can't say anything concrete about how Richard Colbeck voted on market-led approaches to protecting biodiversity
How Richard Colbeck voted compared to someone who agrees that the federal government should address the destruction of Australia's biodiversity by commodifying the protection of natural environments (e.g., issuing certificates or credits for biodiversity protection that can then be sold on the market)
Most important divisions relevant to this policy
These are the most important divisions related to the policy “for market-led approaches to protecting biodiversity” which Richard Colbeck could have attended. They are weighted much more strongly than other divisions when calculating the position of Richard Colbeck on this policy.
| Division | Richard Colbeck | Supporters vote |
|---|---|---|
5th Dec 2023, 8:59 PM – Senate Nature Repair Market Bill 2023 and Nature Repair Market (Consequential Amendments) Bill 2023 - Third Reading - Pass the bills |
absent | Yes |
Other divisions relevant to this policy
These are less important divisions which are related to the policy “for market-led approaches to protecting biodiversity” which Richard Colbeck could have attended.
| Division | Richard Colbeck | Supporters vote | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| no votes listed | ||||||
How "We can't say anything concrete about how they voted on" is worked out
Normally a person's votes count towards a score which is used to work out a simple phrase to summarise their position on a policy. However in this case Richard Colbeck was absent during all divisions for this policy. So, it's impossible to say anything concrete.