We can't say anything concrete about how Richard Colbeck voted on ceremonial recognition of the first people in Australia
How Richard Colbeck voted compared to someone who agrees that the federal government should support efforts to close the gap between Indigenous and non-Indigenous Australians by also supporting ceremonial inititiatives that aim to recognise Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander peoples and nations
Most important divisions relevant to this policy
These are the most important divisions related to the policy “for ceremonial recognition of the first people in Australia” which Richard Colbeck could have attended. They are weighted much more strongly than other divisions when calculating the position of Richard Colbeck on this policy.
| Division | Richard Colbeck | Supporters vote | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| no votes listed | ||||||
Other divisions relevant to this policy
These are less important divisions which are related to the policy “for ceremonial recognition of the first people in Australia” which Richard Colbeck could have attended.
| Division | Richard Colbeck | Supporters vote |
|---|---|---|
10th May 2006, 3:47 PM – Senate Motions - National Sorry Day - Day of remembrance |
No | Yes |
How "We can't say anything concrete about how they voted on" is worked out
Richard Colbeck has only voted once on this policy and it wasn't on a "strong" vote. So it's not possible to draw a clear conclusion about their position.
This could be because there were simply not many relevant divisions (formal votes) during the time they've been in parliament (most votes happen on "the voices", so we simply have no decent record) or they were absent for votes that could have contributed to their voting record.