We can't say anything concrete about how Richard Colbeck voted on recognising local government in the Constitution
How Richard Colbeck voted compared to someone who agrees that local government should be recognised in the Australian Constitution
Most important divisions relevant to this policy
These are the most important divisions related to the policy “for recognising local government in the Constitution” which Richard Colbeck could have attended. They are weighted much more strongly than other divisions when calculating the position of Richard Colbeck on this policy.
Division | Richard Colbeck | Supporters vote |
---|---|---|
24th Jun 2013, 8:19 PM – Senate Constitution Alteration (Local Government) 2013 - Third Reading - Pass the bill |
absent | Yes |
24th Jun 2013, 8:11 PM – Senate Constitution Alteration (Local Government) 2013 - Second Reading - Agree with the bill's main idea |
absent | Yes |
Other divisions relevant to this policy
These are less important divisions which are related to the policy “for recognising local government in the Constitution” which Richard Colbeck could have attended.
Division | Richard Colbeck | Supporters vote |
---|---|---|
7th Sep 2006, 9:56 AM – Senate Motions - Local Government in Australia - Referendum |
absent | Yes |
How "We can't say anything concrete about how they voted on" is worked out
Normally a person's votes count towards a score which is used to work out a simple phrase to summarise their position on a policy. However in this case Richard Colbeck was absent during all divisions for this policy. So, it's impossible to say anything concrete.