We can't say anything concrete about how Nick Sherry voted on increasing the age pension
How Nick Sherry voted compared to someone who agrees that the federal government should increase the amount of the age pension
Most important divisions relevant to this policy
These are the most important divisions related to the policy “for increasing the age pension” which Nick Sherry could have attended. They are weighted much more strongly than other divisions when calculating the position of Nick Sherry on this policy.
| Division | Nick Sherry | Supporters vote | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| no votes listed | ||||||
Other divisions relevant to this policy
These are less important divisions which are related to the policy “for increasing the age pension” which Nick Sherry could have attended.
| Division | Nick Sherry | Supporters vote |
|---|---|---|
15th Oct 2008, 3:38 PM – Senate Motions - Fair Go for Pensioners Coalition (FGFP) - Consider incorporating FGFP's statement of claims |
absent | Yes |
16th Aug 2007, 10:22 AM – Senate Motions - Age Pension - Increase age pension |
absent | Yes |
How "We can't say anything concrete about how they voted on" is worked out
Normally a person's votes count towards a score which is used to work out a simple phrase to summarise their position on a policy. However in this case Nick Sherry was absent during all divisions for this policy. So, it's impossible to say anything concrete.