We can't say anything concrete about how Nick Sherry voted on unconventional gas mining
How Nick Sherry voted compared to someone who agrees that the federal government should allow companies to mine coal seam (CSG), tight and shale gas
Most important divisions relevant to this policy
These are the most important divisions related to the policy “for unconventional gas mining” which Nick Sherry could have attended. They are weighted much more strongly than other divisions when calculating the position of Nick Sherry on this policy.
Division | Nick Sherry | Supporters vote | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
no votes listed |
Other divisions relevant to this policy
These are less important divisions which are related to the policy “for unconventional gas mining” which Nick Sherry could have attended.
Division | Nick Sherry | Supporters vote |
---|---|---|
22nd Mar 2012, 1:53 PM – Senate Motions - Mining - Moratorium on coal seam gas |
No | No |
20th Mar 2012, 4:29 PM – Senate Motions - Coal Seam Gas - Address uncertainty about coal seam gas emissions |
absent | No |
10th Nov 2011 – Senate Motions - Great Barrier Reef - Suspend applications and approvals until after UNESCO assessment |
absent | No |
9th Nov 2011 – Senate Motions - Coal Seam Gas - Protect water systems and the environment |
absent | No |
9th Nov 2011 – Senate Motions - Great Barrier Reef - Suspend applications and approvals until after UNESCO assessment |
absent | No |
13th Sep 2011 – Senate Motions - Coal Seam Gas - Moratorium on new coal seam gas approvals |
absent | No |
How "We can't say anything concrete about how they voted on" is worked out
Nick Sherry has only voted once on this policy and it wasn't on a "strong" vote. So it's not possible to draw a clear conclusion about their position.
This could be because there were simply not many relevant divisions (formal votes) during the time they've been in parliament (most votes happen on "the voices", so we simply have no decent record) or they were absent for votes that could have contributed to their voting record.