We can't say anything concrete about how Nick Sherry voted on maintaining or increasing CSIRO funding
How Nick Sherry voted compared to someone who agrees that the federal government should maintain or increase the amount of funding allocated to the Commonwealth Scientific and Industrial Research Organisation (CSIRO)
Most important divisions relevant to this policy
These are the most important divisions related to the policy “for maintaining or increasing CSIRO funding” which Nick Sherry could have attended. They are weighted much more strongly than other divisions when calculating the position of Nick Sherry on this policy.
| Division | Nick Sherry | Supporters vote | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| no votes listed | ||||||
Other divisions relevant to this policy
These are less important divisions which are related to the policy “for maintaining or increasing CSIRO funding” which Nick Sherry could have attended.
| Division | Nick Sherry | Supporters vote |
|---|---|---|
14th Feb 2008, 10:22 AM – Senate Motions - Climate Change - Reverse decision to cut funding |
absent | Yes |
9th Feb 2006, 9:40 AM – Senate Motions - Commonwealth Scientific and Industrial Research Organisation - Renewable energy |
No | Yes |
How "We can't say anything concrete about how they voted on" is worked out
Nick Sherry has only voted once on this policy and it wasn't on a "strong" vote. So it's not possible to draw a clear conclusion about their position.
This could be because there were simply not many relevant divisions (formal votes) during the time they've been in parliament (most votes happen on "the voices", so we simply have no decent record) or they were absent for votes that could have contributed to their voting record.