We can't say anything concrete about how Nick McKim voted on storing all citizens' telecommunications data for access by government agencies
How Nick McKim voted compared to someone who agrees that telecommunications providers should be required to store all their customers' usages data for later access by agencies with the Attorney General's consent
Most important divisions relevant to this policy
These are the most important divisions related to the policy “for storing all citizens' telecommunications data for access by government agencies” which Nick McKim could have attended. They are weighted much more strongly than other divisions when calculating the position of Nick McKim on this policy.
| Division | Nick McKim | Supporters vote | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| no votes listed | ||||||
Other divisions relevant to this policy
These are less important divisions which are related to the policy “for storing all citizens' telecommunications data for access by government agencies” which Nick McKim could have attended.
| Division | Nick McKim | Supporters vote |
|---|---|---|
16th Mar 2016 – Senate Motions - Mandatory Telecommunications Data Retention Scheme - Repeal the scheme |
absent | No |
How "We can't say anything concrete about how they voted on" is worked out
Normally a person's votes count towards a score which is used to work out a simple phrase to summarise their position on a policy. However in this case Nick McKim was absent during all divisions for this policy. So, it's impossible to say anything concrete.