We can't say anything concrete about how Nick McKim voted on reducing economic inequality
How Nick McKim voted compared to someone who agrees that the federal government should intervene to ensure Australia's wealth is distributed more evenly
Most important divisions relevant to this policy
These are the most important divisions related to the policy “for reducing economic inequality” which Nick McKim could have attended. They are weighted much more strongly than other divisions when calculating the position of Nick McKim on this policy.
| Division | Nick McKim | Supporters vote | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| no votes listed | ||||||
Other divisions relevant to this policy
These are less important divisions which are related to the policy “for reducing economic inequality” which Nick McKim could have attended.
| Division | Nick McKim | Supporters vote |
|---|---|---|
26th Oct 2022, 10:46 AM – Senate Supply Bill (No. 3) 2022-2023, Supply Bill (No. 4) 2022-2023 and another - Second Reading - Repeal stage 3 tax cuts |
Yes | Yes |
How "We can't say anything concrete about how they voted on" is worked out
Nick McKim has only voted once on this policy and it wasn't on a "strong" vote. So it's not possible to draw a clear conclusion about their position.
This could be because there were simply not many relevant divisions (formal votes) during the time they've been in parliament (most votes happen on "the voices", so we simply have no decent record) or they were absent for votes that could have contributed to their voting record.