We can't say anything concrete about how John Watson voted on decreasing the gender pay gap
How John Watson voted compared to someone who agrees that the federal government should introduce legislation that reduces the gap in income between women and men and ensures both sexes are paid equally well
Most important divisions relevant to this policy
These are the most important divisions related to the policy “for decreasing the gender pay gap” which John Watson could have attended. They are weighted much more strongly than other divisions when calculating the position of John Watson on this policy.
| Division | John Watson | Supporters vote | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| no votes listed | ||||||
Other divisions relevant to this policy
These are less important divisions which are related to the policy “for decreasing the gender pay gap” which John Watson could have attended.
| Division | John Watson | Supporters vote |
|---|---|---|
7th Feb 2007, 3:49 PM – Senate Motions - Commission on the Status of Women - End discrimination and gender-based violence |
No | Yes |
How "We can't say anything concrete about how they voted on" is worked out
John Watson has only voted once on this policy and it wasn't on a "strong" vote. So it's not possible to draw a clear conclusion about their position.
This could be because there were simply not many relevant divisions (formal votes) during the time they've been in parliament (most votes happen on "the voices", so we simply have no decent record) or they were absent for votes that could have contributed to their voting record.