We can't say anything concrete about how Helen Polley voted on maintaining or increasing CSIRO funding
How Helen Polley voted compared to someone who agrees that the federal government should maintain or increase the amount of funding allocated to the Commonwealth Scientific and Industrial Research Organisation (CSIRO)
Most important divisions relevant to this policy
These are the most important divisions related to the policy “for maintaining or increasing CSIRO funding” which Helen Polley could have attended. They are weighted much more strongly than other divisions when calculating the position of Helen Polley on this policy.
| Division | Helen Polley | Supporters vote | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| no votes listed | ||||||
Other divisions relevant to this policy
These are less important divisions which are related to the policy “for maintaining or increasing CSIRO funding” which Helen Polley could have attended.
| Division | Helen Polley | Supporters vote |
|---|---|---|
1st Sep 2014, 3:39 PM – Senate Motions - Australian Animal Health Laboratory - Fund CSIRO |
absent | Yes |
14th Feb 2008, 10:22 AM – Senate Motions - Climate Change - Reverse decision to cut funding |
absent | Yes |
9th Feb 2006, 9:40 AM – Senate Motions - Commonwealth Scientific and Industrial Research Organisation - Renewable energy |
No | Yes |
How "We can't say anything concrete about how they voted on" is worked out
Helen Polley has only voted once on this policy and it wasn't on a "strong" vote. So it's not possible to draw a clear conclusion about their position.
This could be because there were simply not many relevant divisions (formal votes) during the time they've been in parliament (most votes happen on "the voices", so we simply have no decent record) or they were absent for votes that could have contributed to their voting record.