We can't say anything concrete about how Catryna Bilyk voted on increasing parliamentary scrutiny of bills
How Catryna Bilyk voted compared to someone who agrees that the parliament, particularly the Senate, should send bills to committees for inquiry to ensure that all bills are properly scrutinised before they pass through parliament to become law
Most important divisions relevant to this policy
These are the most important divisions related to the policy “for increasing parliamentary scrutiny of bills” which Catryna Bilyk could have attended. They are weighted much more strongly than other divisions when calculating the position of Catryna Bilyk on this policy.
| Division | Catryna Bilyk | Supporters vote | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| no votes listed | ||||||
Other divisions relevant to this policy
These are less important divisions which are related to the policy “for increasing parliamentary scrutiny of bills” which Catryna Bilyk could have attended.
| Division | Catryna Bilyk | Supporters vote |
|---|---|---|
10th Feb 2022, 11:44 AM – Senate Committees - Selection of Bills Committee; Report - Inquire into two bills |
absent | Yes |
10th Feb 2022, 11:31 AM – Senate Committees - Selection of Bills Committee; Report - Inquire into three electoral bills |
absent | Yes |
17th Jun 2021, 12:39 PM – Senate Committees - Selection of Bills Committee; Report - Ministerial Suitability Commission of Inquiry Bill 2021 |
absent | No |
17th Jun 2021, 12:36 PM – Senate Committees - Selection of Bills Committee; Report - Ministerial Suitability Commission of Inquiry Bill 2021 |
absent | Yes |
How "We can't say anything concrete about how they voted on" is worked out
Normally a person's votes count towards a score which is used to work out a simple phrase to summarise their position on a policy. However in this case Catryna Bilyk was absent during all divisions for this policy. So, it's impossible to say anything concrete.