We can't say anything concrete about how Carol Brown voted on reducing air pollution
How Carol Brown voted compared to someone who agrees that the federal government should develop policies and legislation that reduce air pollution, including vehicle emissions
Most important divisions relevant to this policy
These are the most important divisions related to the policy “for reducing air pollution” which Carol Brown could have attended. They are weighted much more strongly than other divisions when calculating the position of Carol Brown on this policy.
| Division | Carol Brown | Supporters vote | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| no votes listed | ||||||
Other divisions relevant to this policy
These are less important divisions which are related to the policy “for reducing air pollution” which Carol Brown could have attended.
| Division | Carol Brown | Supporters vote |
|---|---|---|
13th May 2020, 4:21 PM – Senate Motions - Transport Infrastructure - Funding for active transport (cycling, walking etc) |
absent | Yes |
27th Nov 2018, 1:58 PM – Senate Road Vehicle Standards Bill 2018 and others - Second Reading - Reduce vehicle emissions |
absent | Yes |
15th Aug 2018, 5:21 PM – Senate Regulations and Determinations - Product Emissions Standards (Excise) Charges Regulations 2018, Product Emissions Standards (Customs) Charges Regulations 2018 - Disallow |
absent | No |
10th May 2018, 12:44 PM – Senate Interstate Road Transport Legislation (Repeal) Bill 2018 - Second Reading - Address emissions |
absent | Yes |
19th Apr 2016, 6:49 PM – Senate Motions - Public Transport - Prioritise funding |
absent | Yes |
24th Nov 2014, 4:59 PM – Senate Motions - Westconnex - Don't construct WestConnex |
No | Yes |
How "We can't say anything concrete about how they voted on" is worked out
Carol Brown has only voted once on this policy and it wasn't on a "strong" vote. So it's not possible to draw a clear conclusion about their position.
This could be because there were simply not many relevant divisions (formal votes) during the time they've been in parliament (most votes happen on "the voices", so we simply have no decent record) or they were absent for votes that could have contributed to their voting record.