We can't say anything concrete about how Anne Urquhart voted on technology neutral emission reduction targets
How Anne Urquhart voted compared to someone who agrees that the federal government's policies to reduce Australia's greenhouse gas emissions should be "technology neutral", which means all forms of electricity generation should be on the table, including coal with carbon capture and storage and gas
Most important divisions relevant to this policy
These are the most important divisions related to the policy “for technology neutral emission reduction targets” which Anne Urquhart could have attended. They are weighted much more strongly than other divisions when calculating the position of Anne Urquhart on this policy.
| Division | Anne Urquhart | Supporters vote | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| no votes listed | ||||||
Other divisions relevant to this policy
These are less important divisions which are related to the policy “for technology neutral emission reduction targets” which Anne Urquhart could have attended.
| Division | Anne Urquhart | Supporters vote |
|---|---|---|
1st Dec 2016, 4:30 PM – Senate Motions - Coal Industry - For technology neutral policies |
absent | Yes |
How "We can't say anything concrete about how they voted on" is worked out
Normally a person's votes count towards a score which is used to work out a simple phrase to summarise their position on a policy. However in this case Anne Urquhart was absent during all divisions for this policy. So, it's impossible to say anything concrete.