We can't say anything concrete about how Tim Storer voted on increasing funding for public schools
How Tim Storer voted compared to someone who agrees that the federal government should increase funding for public schools and prioritise their funding over non-government (private) schools
Most important divisions relevant to this policy
These are the most important divisions related to the policy “for increasing funding for public schools” which Tim Storer could have attended. They are weighted much more strongly than other divisions when calculating the position of Tim Storer on this policy.
| Division | Tim Storer | Supporters vote | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| no votes listed | ||||||
Other divisions relevant to this policy
These are less important divisions which are related to the policy “for increasing funding for public schools” which Tim Storer could have attended.
| Division | Tim Storer | Supporters vote |
|---|---|---|
17th Oct 2018, 3:42 PM – Senate Motions - Schools - Fund public schools |
No | Yes |
How "We can't say anything concrete about how they voted on" is worked out
Tim Storer has only voted once on this policy and it wasn't on a "strong" vote. So it's not possible to draw a clear conclusion about their position.
This could be because there were simply not many relevant divisions (formal votes) during the time they've been in parliament (most votes happen on "the voices", so we simply have no decent record) or they were absent for votes that could have contributed to their voting record.