We can't say anything concrete about how Tim Storer voted on changing the wording of section 18C of the Racial Discrimination Act
How Tim Storer voted compared to someone who agrees that the federal government should change section 18C of the Racial Discrimination Act so that the words "insult", "offend", "humiliate" are replaced with the word "harass"
Most important divisions relevant to this policy
These are the most important divisions related to the policy “for changing the wording of section 18C of the Racial Discrimination Act” which Tim Storer could have attended. They are weighted much more strongly than other divisions when calculating the position of Tim Storer on this policy.
| Division | Tim Storer | Supporters vote | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| no votes listed | ||||||
Other divisions relevant to this policy
These are less important divisions which are related to the policy “for changing the wording of section 18C of the Racial Discrimination Act” which Tim Storer could have attended.
| Division | Tim Storer | Supporters vote |
|---|---|---|
21st Mar 2018, 4:20 PM – Senate Motions - International Day for the Elimination of Racial Discrimination - Condemn Turnbull Government |
absent | No |
How "We can't say anything concrete about how they voted on" is worked out
Normally a person's votes count towards a score which is used to work out a simple phrase to summarise their position on a policy. However in this case Tim Storer was absent during all divisions for this policy. So, it's impossible to say anything concrete.