We can't say anything concrete about how Tim Storer voted on more scrutiny of the Australian Defence Force
How Tim Storer voted compared to someone who agrees that there should be more scrutiny or oversight of the actions and powers of the Australian Defence Force (ADF), both within Australia and overseas
Most important divisions relevant to this policy
These are the most important divisions related to the policy “for more scrutiny of the Australian Defence Force” which Tim Storer could have attended. They are weighted much more strongly than other divisions when calculating the position of Tim Storer on this policy.
| Division | Tim Storer | Supporters vote | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| no votes listed | ||||||
Other divisions relevant to this policy
These are less important divisions which are related to the policy “for more scrutiny of the Australian Defence Force” which Tim Storer could have attended.
| Division | Tim Storer | Supporters vote |
|---|---|---|
27th Nov 2018, 12:16 PM – Senate Defence Amendment (Call Out of the Australian Defence Force) Bill 2018 - Second Reading - Agree with bill's main idea |
absent | No |
27th Nov 2018, 12:13 PM – Senate Defence Amendment (Call Out of the Australian Defence Force) Bill 2018 - Second Reading - Make disallowable instruments |
absent | Yes |
How "We can't say anything concrete about how they voted on" is worked out
Normally a person's votes count towards a score which is used to work out a simple phrase to summarise their position on a policy. However in this case Tim Storer was absent during all divisions for this policy. So, it's impossible to say anything concrete.