We can't say anything concrete about how Stirling Griff voted on increasing funding for road infrastructure
How Stirling Griff voted compared to someone who agrees that the federal government should provide more funding for road infrastructure
Most important divisions relevant to this policy
These are the most important divisions related to the policy “for increasing funding for road infrastructure” which Stirling Griff could have attended. They are weighted much more strongly than other divisions when calculating the position of Stirling Griff on this policy.
Division | Stirling Griff | Supporters vote | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
no votes listed |
Other divisions relevant to this policy
These are less important divisions which are related to the policy “for increasing funding for road infrastructure” which Stirling Griff could have attended.
Division | Stirling Griff | Supporters vote |
---|---|---|
11th Sep 2019, 4:10 PM – Senate Committees - Rural and Regional Affairs and Transport References Committee - Reference |
absent | Yes |
How "We can't say anything concrete about how they voted on" is worked out
Normally a person's votes count towards a score which is used to work out a simple phrase to summarise their position on a policy. However in this case Stirling Griff was absent during all divisions for this policy. So, it's impossible to say anything concrete.