We can't say anything concrete about how Stirling Griff voted on decreasing subsidisation of fossil fuels
How Stirling Griff voted compared to someone who agrees that the federal government should decrease the subsidisation of taxpayer money into fossil fuels
Most important divisions relevant to this policy
These are the most important divisions related to the policy “for decreasing subsidisation of fossil fuels” which Stirling Griff could have attended. They are weighted much more strongly than other divisions when calculating the position of Stirling Griff on this policy.
Division | Stirling Griff | Supporters vote |
---|---|---|
3rd Aug 2021, 5:51 PM – Senate Regulations and Determinations - Industry Research and Development - Disallow two instruments |
absent | Yes |
Other divisions relevant to this policy
These are less important divisions which are related to the policy “for decreasing subsidisation of fossil fuels” which Stirling Griff could have attended.
Division | Stirling Griff | Supporters vote |
---|---|---|
16th Jun 2021, 3:53 PM – Senate Motions - Climate Change - G7 resolutions |
absent | Yes |
13th May 2021, 12:30 PM – Senate Motions - Climate Change - Stop funding fossil fuels |
absent | Yes |
2nd Dec 2019, 4:17 PM – Senate Motions - Mining - Withdraw support for Adani |
absent | Yes |
How "We can't say anything concrete about how they voted on" is worked out
Normally a person's votes count towards a score which is used to work out a simple phrase to summarise their position on a policy. However in this case Stirling Griff was absent during all divisions for this policy. So, it's impossible to say anything concrete.