We can't say anything concrete about how Stirling Griff voted on mandatory minimum sentences for certain offences
How Stirling Griff voted compared to someone who agrees that the federal government should include mandatory minimum sentences in their federal-level criminal laws that deal with crimes such as child sex offences
Most important divisions relevant to this policy
These are the most important divisions related to the policy “for mandatory minimum sentences for certain offences” which Stirling Griff could have attended. They are weighted much more strongly than other divisions when calculating the position of Stirling Griff on this policy.
| Division | Stirling Griff | Supporters vote |
|---|---|---|
16th Jun 2020, 3:28 PM – Senate Crimes Legislation Amendment (Sexual Crimes Against Children and Community Protection Measures) Bill 2019 - Consideration of House of Representatives Message - Mandatory minimum sentences |
absent | Yes |
15th Jun 2020, 7:55 PM – Senate Crimes Legislation Amendment (Sexual Crimes Against Children and Community Protection Measures) Bill 2019 - in Committee - Mandatory minimum sentences |
absent | Yes |
15th Jun 2020, 7:48 PM – Senate Crimes Legislation Amendment (Sexual Crimes Against Children and Community Protection Measures) Bill 2019 - in Committee - Mandatory minimum sentences |
absent | No |
Other divisions relevant to this policy
These are less important divisions which are related to the policy “for mandatory minimum sentences for certain offences” which Stirling Griff could have attended.
| Division | Stirling Griff | Supporters vote | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| no votes listed | ||||||
How "We can't say anything concrete about how they voted on" is worked out
Normally a person's votes count towards a score which is used to work out a simple phrase to summarise their position on a policy. However in this case Stirling Griff was absent during all divisions for this policy. So, it's impossible to say anything concrete.