We can't say anything concrete about how Stirling Griff voted on ending immigration detention on Nauru
How Stirling Griff voted compared to someone who agrees that the federal government should close its Nauru Regional Processing Centre and stop all Nauru-based processing of people's claims for asylum
Most important divisions relevant to this policy
These are the most important divisions related to the policy “for ending immigration detention on Nauru” which Stirling Griff could have attended. They are weighted much more strongly than other divisions when calculating the position of Stirling Griff on this policy.
| Division | Stirling Griff | Supporters vote | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| no votes listed | ||||||
Other divisions relevant to this policy
These are less important divisions which are related to the policy “for ending immigration detention on Nauru” which Stirling Griff could have attended.
| Division | Stirling Griff | Supporters vote |
|---|---|---|
15th Feb 2018, 11:56 AM – Senate Motions - Asylum Seekers - End offshore detention |
absent | Yes |
20th Jun 2017, 4:00 PM – Senate Motions - Asylum Seekers - Close Nauru and Manus Is. detention centres |
absent | Yes |
How "We can't say anything concrete about how they voted on" is worked out
Normally a person's votes count towards a score which is used to work out a simple phrase to summarise their position on a policy. However in this case Stirling Griff was absent during all divisions for this policy. So, it's impossible to say anything concrete.