We can't say anything concrete about how Skye Kakoschke-Moore voted on increasing parliamentary entitlements for current MPs and Senators
How Skye Kakoschke-Moore voted compared to someone who agrees that the federal governmnet should increase parliamentary entitlements for current MPs and Senators, such as legitimate expenditure, salary packages, superannuation entitlements and/or other allowances like the printing allowance
Most important divisions relevant to this policy
These are the most important divisions related to the policy “for increasing parliamentary entitlements for current MPs and Senators” which Skye Kakoschke-Moore could have attended. They are weighted much more strongly than other divisions when calculating the position of Skye Kakoschke-Moore on this policy.
| Division | Skye Kakoschke-Moore | Supporters vote | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| no votes listed | ||||||
Other divisions relevant to this policy
These are less important divisions which are related to the policy “for increasing parliamentary entitlements for current MPs and Senators” which Skye Kakoschke-Moore could have attended.
| Division | Skye Kakoschke-Moore | Supporters vote |
|---|---|---|
21st Mar 2017, 4:08 PM – Senate Motions - Parliamentarians' Entitlements - Do not increase remuneration until in surplus |
absent | No |
How "We can't say anything concrete about how they voted on" is worked out
Normally a person's votes count towards a score which is used to work out a simple phrase to summarise their position on a policy. However in this case Skye Kakoschke-Moore was absent during all divisions for this policy. So, it's impossible to say anything concrete.