We can't say anything concrete about how Skye Kakoschke-Moore voted on increasing trade unions' powers in the workplace
How Skye Kakoschke-Moore voted compared to someone who agrees that the federal government should introduce legislation that increases the powers and influence of trade unions in workplace relations
Most important divisions relevant to this policy
These are the most important divisions related to the policy “for increasing trade unions' powers in the workplace” which Skye Kakoschke-Moore could have attended. They are weighted much more strongly than other divisions when calculating the position of Skye Kakoschke-Moore on this policy.
| Division | Skye Kakoschke-Moore | Supporters vote | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| no votes listed | ||||||
Other divisions relevant to this policy
These are less important divisions which are related to the policy “for increasing trade unions' powers in the workplace” which Skye Kakoschke-Moore could have attended.
| Division | Skye Kakoschke-Moore | Supporters vote |
|---|---|---|
16th Oct 2017, 1:46 PM – Senate Competition and Consumer Amendment (Competition Policy Review) Bill 2017 - in Committee - Secondary boycotts |
No | No |
How "We can't say anything concrete about how they voted on" is worked out
Skye Kakoschke-Moore has only voted once on this policy and it wasn't on a "strong" vote. So it's not possible to draw a clear conclusion about their position.
This could be because there were simply not many relevant divisions (formal votes) during the time they've been in parliament (most votes happen on "the voices", so we simply have no decent record) or they were absent for votes that could have contributed to their voting record.