Most important divisions relevant to this policy

These are the most important divisions related to the policy “for ending government investment in fossil fuels” which Skye Kakoschke-Moore could have attended. They are weighted much more strongly than other divisions when calculating the position of Skye Kakoschke-Moore on this policy.

Division	Skye Kakoschke-Moore	Supporters vote
no votes listed

Other divisions relevant to this policy

These are less important divisions which are related to the policy “for ending government investment in fossil fuels” which Skye Kakoschke-Moore could have attended.

Division	Skye Kakoschke-Moore	Supporters vote
6th Sep 2017, 11:22 AM – Senate Export Finance and Insurance Corporation Amendment (Support for Commonwealth Entities) Bill 2017 - in Committee - Fossil fuels	No	Yes

How "We can't say anything concrete about how they voted on" is worked out

Skye Kakoschke-Moore has only voted once on this policy and it wasn't on a "strong" vote. So it's not possible to draw a clear conclusion about their position.

This could be because there were simply not many relevant divisions (formal votes) during the time they've been in parliament (most votes happen on "the voices", so we simply have no decent record) or they were absent for votes that could have contributed to their voting record.