We can't say anything concrete about how Skye Kakoschke-Moore voted on Adani's proposed Carmichael coal mine in the Galilee Basin
How Skye Kakoschke-Moore voted compared to someone who agrees that the federal government should support the Adani Group's plans to build the Carmichael mine in Queensland's Galilee Basin
Most important divisions relevant to this policy
These are the most important divisions related to the policy “for Adani's proposed Carmichael coal mine in the Galilee Basin” which Skye Kakoschke-Moore could have attended. They are weighted much more strongly than other divisions when calculating the position of Skye Kakoschke-Moore on this policy.
Division | Skye Kakoschke-Moore | Supporters vote | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
no votes listed |
Other divisions relevant to this policy
These are less important divisions which are related to the policy “for Adani's proposed Carmichael coal mine in the Galilee Basin” which Skye Kakoschke-Moore could have attended.
Division | Skye Kakoschke-Moore | Supporters vote |
---|---|---|
16th Aug 2017, 12:16 PM – Senate Great Barrier Reef Marine Park Amendment Bill 2017 - Second Reading - Stop Adani mine |
absent | No |
19th Jun 2017, 3:53 PM – Senate Motions - Mining - Adani's Carmichael mine |
Yes | No |
14th Jun 2017 – Senate Motions - Adani Carmichael Coalmine - Support |
absent | Yes |
How "We can't say anything concrete about how they voted on" is worked out
Skye Kakoschke-Moore has only voted once on this policy and it wasn't on a "strong" vote. So it's not possible to draw a clear conclusion about their position.
This could be because there were simply not many relevant divisions (formal votes) during the time they've been in parliament (most votes happen on "the voices", so we simply have no decent record) or they were absent for votes that could have contributed to their voting record.