We can't say anything concrete about how Skye Kakoschke-Moore voted on regional processing of asylum seekers
How Skye Kakoschke-Moore voted compared to someone who agrees that asylum seekers who arrive in Australia without a visa, particularly those who arrive by boat, should have their asylum claims processed regionally in a country such as the Republic of Nauru or Papua New Guinea (See the policy "For offshore processing of asylum seekers" for more on processing asylum seeker claims in Australian territories like Christmas Island)
Most important divisions relevant to this policy
These are the most important divisions related to the policy “for regional processing of asylum seekers” which Skye Kakoschke-Moore could have attended. They are weighted much more strongly than other divisions when calculating the position of Skye Kakoschke-Moore on this policy.
| Division | Skye Kakoschke-Moore | Supporters vote | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| no votes listed | ||||||
Other divisions relevant to this policy
These are less important divisions which are related to the policy “for regional processing of asylum seekers” which Skye Kakoschke-Moore could have attended.
| Division | Skye Kakoschke-Moore | Supporters vote |
|---|---|---|
10th Aug 2017, 12:38 PM – Senate Motions - Asylum Seekers - Bring them to Australia |
absent | No |
20th Jun 2017, 4:00 PM – Senate Motions - Asylum Seekers - Close Nauru and Manus Is. detention centres |
absent | No |
29th Mar 2017 – Senate Motions - Asylum Seekers - End detention on Nauru and Manus Island |
absent | No |
12th Sep 2016, 4:48 PM – Senate Committees - Legal and Constitutional Affairs References Committee - Nauru & Manus Island centres |
Yes | No |
How "We can't say anything concrete about how they voted on" is worked out
Skye Kakoschke-Moore has only voted once on this policy and it wasn't on a "strong" vote. So it's not possible to draw a clear conclusion about their position.
This could be because there were simply not many relevant divisions (formal votes) during the time they've been in parliament (most votes happen on "the voices", so we simply have no decent record) or they were absent for votes that could have contributed to their voting record.