Most important divisions relevant to this policy

These are the most important divisions related to the policy “for increasing transparency of the China-Australia relationship” which Simon Birmingham could have attended. They are weighted much more strongly than other divisions when calculating the position of Simon Birmingham on this policy.

Division	Simon Birmingham	Supporters vote
no votes listed

Other divisions relevant to this policy

These are less important divisions which are related to the policy “for increasing transparency of the China-Australia relationship” which Simon Birmingham could have attended.

Division	Simon Birmingham	Supporters vote
16th Jun 2021, 7:12 PM – Senate Committees - Foreign Affairs, Defence and Trade References Committee' Reference - China	absent	Yes
1st Dec 2020, 4:01 PM – Senate Committees - Treaties Committee - Reference	absent	Yes
10th Jun 2020, 6:24 PM – Senate Committees - Foreign Affairs, Defence and Trade References Committee; Reference - China	absent	Yes
3rd Dec 2019, 7:10 PM – Senate Committees - Foreign Affairs, Defence and Trade References Committee - Australia's relationship with China	absent	Yes
11th Nov 2019, 5:50 PM – Senate Committees - Foreign Affairs, Defence and Trade References Committee - Reference	absent	Yes
9th Sep 2019, 9:13 PM – Senate Committees - Foreign Affairs, Defence and Trade References Committee - Reference	absent	Yes
13th Nov 2018, 4:13 PM – Senate Committees - Foreign Affairs, Defence and Trade References Committee - Refer to Committee	absent	Yes
14th Jun 2017, 4:26 PM – Senate Motions - Influence of Foreign Agents - Royal Commission	absent	Yes

How "We can't say anything concrete about how they voted on" is worked out

Normally a person's votes count towards a score which is used to work out a simple phrase to summarise their position on a policy. However in this case Simon Birmingham was absent during all divisions for this policy. So, it's impossible to say anything concrete.