We can't say anything concrete about how Simon Birmingham voted on building Australia’s new submarine fleet in South Australia
How Simon Birmingham voted compared to someone who agrees that the federal government should make sure that a planned fleet of 12 new submarines is built in South Australia (this new fleet was proposed in 2013 to replace the existing Collins Class submarine fleet)
Most important divisions relevant to this policy
These are the most important divisions related to the policy “for building Australia’s new submarine fleet in South Australia” which Simon Birmingham could have attended. They are weighted much more strongly than other divisions when calculating the position of Simon Birmingham on this policy.
| Division | Simon Birmingham | Supporters vote | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| no votes listed | ||||||
Other divisions relevant to this policy
These are less important divisions which are related to the policy “for building Australia’s new submarine fleet in South Australia” which Simon Birmingham could have attended.
| Division | Simon Birmingham | Supporters vote |
|---|---|---|
25th Feb 2020, 4:33 PM – Senate Motions - Collins Class Submarines - Current sustainment model |
absent | Yes |
26th Nov 2014, 5:32 PM – Senate Motions - Censure the Minister for Defence |
No | Yes |
How "We can't say anything concrete about how they voted on" is worked out
Simon Birmingham has only voted once on this policy and it wasn't on a "strong" vote. So it's not possible to draw a clear conclusion about their position.
This could be because there were simply not many relevant divisions (formal votes) during the time they've been in parliament (most votes happen on "the voices", so we simply have no decent record) or they were absent for votes that could have contributed to their voting record.